On 8/29/16 1:27 PM, Ryan Elliott Turner wrote:
I'm a bit confused by what Cort expects. He released the software with a creative-commons license, which doesn't provide any stipulations for end-use. The attribution is required when his software is used in collections, derivatives, and reproductions. Just to run it, that license agreement doesn't require me to do anything. I value the work that he and his cohorts have done, but if he wants public recognition from folks who use his software, the license he is using isn't a good fit.
+1 I can understand his frustration with hams pestering him about a network vs. software. It's one of the things I've been preaching for some time is to separate the software from network. Hams really love systems which let one person control their destiny it seams :( -- Bryan Fields 727-409-1194 - Voice http://bryanfields.net