Ramesh, I tried usbradio on the thin client as well and it use about 23% CPU instead of about 8% per node, it performed ok, but I did notice some audio dropouts. It is important to note that I did not use a service monitor to tune it while running in usbradio mode though, so that very well may have been the cause. I'm using T5730s btw, if that matters.. Robert N5QM On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Benjamin Naber <benjamin@kb9lfz.com> wrote:
Ramesh,
Please explain test conditions, standards expected, and actual results.
I'm running Limey Linux on a thin client. I am using usbradio.conf/chan_usbradio and I've experience zero hangs/freezes/drop-outs/you-name-it.
DSP = CPU intensive? Unless you are running many nodes on one machine that use DSP functions, then I don't think so.
~Benjamin, KB9LFZ
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 20:51 -0400, Ramesh Dhami (VA3UV) wrote:
Hi Robert;
There is a big difference between SimpleUSB and chan_usbradio. The latter is more CPU intensive due to DSP handling.
I have also used the HP Thin Clients with chan_simpleusb - but when I tried to run chan_usbradio on a thin client, it cracked under pressure!
Thanks,
Ramesh.
On 12/08/2013 8:40 PM, Robert Garcia wrote:
Ramesh,
I am running two nodes with SimpleUSB and two hubs on a thin client that has a 1Ghz processor and 1GB or RAM, so I don't expect a netbook to be a problem. :)
Robert N5QM
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Ramesh Dhami (VA3UV) <Ramesh@va3uv.com> wrote:
Hi Guys;
Wonder if anyone is running ACID or Limey, etc., on a Netbook with say 2 full-duplex repeater (running chan_usbradio)?
Thx,
Ramesh.
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users