The commands in rpt.conf are - [functions] 80=status,11 ; ID (local) 81=status,12 ; Time of Day (local) There are local and global commands for this but I suspect you only want or should do it locally on your radio node. You can assign anything you want to the left of the equal sign above as long as it does not conflict with other user commands. If you are not sure what you are doing leave it as it is. Then in the macro context you can specify what to do. Here I show time followed by CWID. [macro] ;Macro number = command string (ea command separated by space) -end with HASH 1=*81 *80# ; play time, CWID and finally in the schedule context you specify when to do it. [schedule] ;dtmf_function = m h dom mon dow ; ala cron, star is implied 1=00 * * * * ;run macro 1 on the hour 73 Doug WA3DSP http://www.crompton.com/hamradio
From: kk4rjy@gmail.com Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 19:05:41 -0500 To: app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org Subject: [App_rpt-users] Time announcement
What is the script i can put in my schedule to have it announce the time hourly?
Thanks
On Nov 18, 2013, at 12:00 PM, app_rpt-users-request@ohnosec.org wrote:
Send App_rpt-users mailing list submissions to app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to app_rpt-users-request@ohnosec.org
You can reach the person managing the list at app_rpt-users-owner@ohnosec.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of App_rpt-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: e2fsck (Benjamin L. Naber)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:45:24 -0500 From: "Benjamin L. Naber" <Benjamin@kb9lfz.com> To: "app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org" <app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] e2fsck Message-ID: <1384793124.3179.8.camel@benjamin-hp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
That's what it appears to me.
A ham this morning told me the problem maybe the person making the distro images is using a windows machine, not linux, and he is making the .img files for FAT when they *should* be ext2
I've been trying everything that I can find to do the filesystem check, but every embedded distro I've tried doesn't support checking DOS or FAT files systems.
~Benjamin, KB9LFZ allstar node 28569
On Mon, 2013-11-18 at 09:37 -0600, Geoff wrote:
On 11/18/2013 07:44 AM, Benjamin L. Naber wrote:
this is coming up when trying to boot a new install of Limey Linux
last time I checked, e2fsck is for EXT2 and other Linux extensions, not FAT.
Booting comes to a dead halt when the e2fsck checktime has been reached.
Any way around this, or disable this checking when booting?
I'm no expert on Limey Linux, but last I checked, when Linux formats and prepares a drive, it is most certainly -not- in a FAT format.
e2fsck is probably checking your drive on -every- bootup because there's an issue with the drive.
From 'man e2fsck' :
DESCRIPTION e2fsck is used to check a Linux second extended file system (ext2fs). E2fsck also supports ext2 filesystems containing a journal, which are also sometimes known as ext3 filesystems, by first applying the journal to the filesystem before continuing with normal e2fsck processing. After the journal has been applied, a filesystem will normally be marked as clean. Hence, for ext3 filesystems, e2fsck will normally run the journal and exit, unless its superblock indicates that further checking is required.
device is the device file where the filesystem is stored (e.g. /dev/hdc1).
Note that in general it is not safe to run e2fsck on mounted filesystems. The only exception is if the -n option is specified, and -c, -l, or -L options are not specified. However, even if it is safe to do so, the results printed by e2fsck are not valid if the filesystem is mounted. If e2fsck asks whether or not you should check a filesystem which is mounted, the only correct answer is ??no??. Only experts who really know what they are doing should consider answering this question in any other way.
73 = Best Regards, -Geoff/W5OMR
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
------------------------------
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
End of App_rpt-users Digest, Vol 57, Issue 56 *********************************************
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users