Ramesh, Please explain test conditions, standards expected, and actual results. I'm running Limey Linux on a thin client. I am using usbradio.conf/chan_usbradio and I've experience zero hangs/freezes/drop-outs/you-name-it. DSP = CPU intensive? Unless you are running many nodes on one machine that use DSP functions, then I don't think so. ~Benjamin, KB9LFZ On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 20:51 -0400, Ramesh Dhami (VA3UV) wrote:
Hi Robert;
There is a big difference between SimpleUSB and chan_usbradio. The latter is more CPU intensive due to DSP handling.
I have also used the HP Thin Clients with chan_simpleusb - but when I tried to run chan_usbradio on a thin client, it cracked under pressure!
Thanks,
Ramesh.
On 12/08/2013 8:40 PM, Robert Garcia wrote:
Ramesh,
I am running two nodes with SimpleUSB and two hubs on a thin client that has a 1Ghz processor and 1GB or RAM, so I don't expect a netbook to be a problem. :)
Robert N5QM
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Ramesh Dhami (VA3UV) <Ramesh@va3uv.com> wrote:
Hi Guys;
Wonder if anyone is running ACID or Limey, etc., on a Netbook with say 2 full-duplex repeater (running chan_usbradio)?
Thx,
Ramesh.
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users