On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Steve Wright <stevewrightnz@gmail.com> wrote:
On 21/08/14 05:02, app_rpt-users-request@ohnosec.org wrote:
From: telesistant@hotmail.com To: doug@crompton.com; app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org Subject: RE: [App_rpt-users] Web transceiver node display Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 06:25:21 -0700
Where do you get off making such a statement? You are in no position to do so. In fact what you are doing here is endorsing activity OFFICIALLY AGAINST Allstar system policy, which absolutely will NOT BE TOLERATED IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM!!!
Grow the fuck up. What other people do is not your business, and you are not in a position to publicly shoot your ugly mouth off at them.
People, including YOU will arbitrarily do freely as they choose, and you will not attack them.
In this case, a suggestion was made to update the official Allstar software to support interoperability with IRLP, which the IRLP owner has clearly objected to, and the the Allstar system has honoured his objection by removing the functionality. What the official Allstar software does absolutely IS Jim's business. Subtler tones maybe could have been used to convey the message, but the message is appropriate - the official Allstar software cannot implement IRLP interoperability. 73, ~iain / N6ML