[App_rpt-users] Speaking of CW IDs

[Mike/W5JR]

Yes, Jim, for Part 97, but other Parts are higher. 

tnx
Mike / W5JR
Milton GA

> On Dec 15, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Jim W7RY <w7ry at centurytel.net> wrote:
> 
> But its the rules!
> 73
> Jim W7RY
> 
> 
> § 97.119 Station identification. 
> (a) Each amateur station, except a space station or telecommand station, must transmit its assigned call sign on its transmitting 
> channel at the end of each communication, and at least every 10 minutes during a communication, for the purpose of clearly making 
> the source of the transmissions from the station known to those receiving the transmissions. No station may transmit unidentified 
> communications or signals, or transmit as the station call sign, any call sign not authorized to the station. 
> (b) The call sign must be transmitted with an emission authorized for the transmitting channel in one of the following ways: (1) By a CW emission. When keyed by an automatic device used only for identification, the speed must not exceed 20 words per 
> minute; 
> 
>> On 12/15/2013 1:30 PM, Geoff wrote:
>>> On 12/15/2013 03:25 PM, Mike/W5JR wrote: 
>>> So, there is a "speed=" in the morse         stanza. Does it have a governor on it to limit the speed maximum to 20 wpm? My entries greater than 20 make no difference.  And why would I want faster than 20 wpm you ask, my HUB nodes are only send "ID" to web transceivers, and I would like them faster. I have observed that at 20 wpm, there is a bit of jitter and faster may not be possible. (An ID I built years ago had a limit on how fast it could go before the code elements were overrun by timing)
>> 
>> I've been meaning to ask that same question. 
>> 
>> Rules wise, since there's no CW requirement *at all* for 'any' license, then there shouldn't be a speed limit on how fast repeater id's should be limited to. 
>> 
>> I like my code speed around 30~35wpm these days.  I used to copy NTS traffic at 40+wpm.  20wpm is such a '~*yawn*~' bore... 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> App_rpt-users mailing list 
>> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org 
>> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20131215/b6d32e99/attachment.html>