[App_rpt-users] Stand alone repeater

[Richard Szajkowski]

Thank you 

I have a node running now ,

I have run out out of ports on my controller , so instead of buying a new controller I would try via allstar

The node is on a static IP on my network and a static IP via my ISP

My idea is to get the 220 repeater up and running with allstar as the controller , 

Or would it just be easier to build with a node / controller ?

Right now , I have a node with Echolink , planning on a remote base (link to other repeaters as needed in the area or simplex) 

Then to add the 220 repeater 

Thanks

Richard Szajkowski


> On Nov 10, 2013, at 6:46 PM, "Bryan D. Boyle" <bdboyle at bdboyle.com> wrote:
> 
> Use a node number under 2000.
> 
> like 1999
> 
> Turn off the registration statements in rpt.conf
> 
> Set up the radio context to point to 127.0.0.1 as the resolving address
> (if you're not on a lan with an address via dhcp or as a fixed address)
> 
> 
> 
>> On 11/10/2013 6:12 PM, Richard Szajkowski wrote:
>> Hello to the group
>> 
>> I am rebuilding my 220 repeater , can I use the uri and allstar as a stand alone repeater controller ?
>> 
>> I don't want any links at this time to the 220 repeater , maybe down the road I will link the VHF to the 220 
>> 
>> So do I need a node number ?
>> 
>> I have read about the remote base , and how to do that 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> Richard Szajkowski
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> App_rpt-users mailing list
>> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
>> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at ohnosec.org
> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users