[App_rpt-users] simplex vs duplex for a home node

Elden Fenison w7ldn at w7ldn.com
Sat Jan 17 21:46:20 UTC 2015


Iain, you make a good point. In my situation, it's probably not worth
doing. It is kind of nice to know if you're doubling with someone however.
But yeah, even if I have a dual-receive node radio... my HT or whatever
would also have to be capable of being able to listen and transmit at the
same time. I was just curious how people do it. It sounds like I would need
a repeater for the node and of some kind of dual-receive radio to talk to
it on that can receive while it's transmitting. That sounds way too spendy
just to avoid doubling.

On Sat Jan 17 2015 at 1:37:54 PM iain macdonnell - N6ML <ar at dseven.org>
wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Skyler F <electricity440 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The easiest way would be a cross band repeater, have it transmit on uhf,
> and
> > receive on vhf or vice versa.
> >
> > Then use the baofeng radio to transmit to your node, they are cheap and
> they
> > can transmit on a different band then they receive on.
>
> That doesn't give you *full* duplex, though - because the Baofeng
> won't receive while it's transmitting. You could do it with a separate
> receiver (i.e. total of four radios)... but what's the point? So
> someone can interrupt you if you get too long-winded???
>
> I'm not sure what problem Elden is trying to solve (if any). The main
> reason for a repeater vs. a simplex node would be if you need to
> service multiple radio users in the local area, and they are not all
> within range of eachother (but are all within range of the node site).
> If you only have a simplex node in that case, the radio users would
> not be able to hear eachother - they'd only hear the remote users via
> the node/link. If the node is in your garage, and for your personal
> use, you probably don't have that problem.
>
> 73,
>
>     ~iain / N6ML
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20150117/3e4b604f/attachment.html>


More information about the App_rpt-users mailing list