[App_rpt-users] BIG registration problem this morning

[Tim Sawyer]

Why do some nodes not have this problem? Is NAT somehow different from
different routers? I'd really like to understand so I can take it back to
the technical folks and explain why it needs to be put back the way it was.

On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 8:06 PM Danny K5CG <k5cg at hamoperator.org> wrote:

> I'm running pfSense and I "could" setup a static port for the outbound NAT
> but since when does the source port ever match the destination port, for
> any protocol? I'm not touching it.
>
> 46679*CLI> iax2 show registry
> Host                  dnsmgr  Username        Perceived
>  Refresh  State
> 44.98.254.145:4569    Y       46679           47.187.195.172:29961
>  60  Auth. Sent
>
> 4569 is what's set on the portal for my node. 29961 appears to be what is
> recorded on the server from my registration.
>
> The portal port needs to be used or there has to be a way to set the port
> in rpt.conf to have that communicated to the registration server. Relying
> on the source port (which can be anything) is not a good idea.
>
> Next steps?
>
> Danny
> K5CG
> _______________________________________________
> App_rpt-users mailing list
> App_rpt-users at lists.allstarlink.org
> http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
>
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit
> http://lists.allstarlink.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and
> scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press
> the "Unsubscribe or edit options button"
> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email
> confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to
> the list detailing the problem.
>


-- 
Tim WD6AWP
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.keekles.org/pipermail/app_rpt-users/attachments/20180812/0834fcf0/attachment.html>