Oh cool, ok, I guess that's another way to do it. So it looks like this? BM 3100 --> DMRl 9 DMRl 9 --> BM 3100 On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Steve Zingman <szingman@msgstor.com> wrote:
We bridge 3100 from BM to TG9. DMRlink allows us to do that and keep 3100 from DCI on 3100. Good to know we are not the only ones that have the BM mapping.
Steve
On 1/25/2016 9:54 AM, Stephen - K1LNX wrote:
Unless Rudy has changed it, 4639 is currently mapped to 3100. This will not work on the U.S. on most C-Bridges including ours. 3100 conflicts with the "bridge" talkgroup on DCI.
I've mentioned this, but I am unsure if they will be able or willing to change it. Another friend of mine mapped his to a different tg, which will work, but roaming between systems can get messy.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Robert Newberry <N1XBM@amsat.org> wrote:
OK Steve, looks like I've gotten the green light. I see on the status page 311221 is setup and says smartpttbridge.
So I have a few questions on the TG and TS for routing in my bridge. I'm a little confused because it seems like on the HT/mobile I'd program my radio for TS2/TG9. I'd be mainly interested in reflector 4639.
If I want TS1 that looks more straightforward. USA is TS1/TG3
Would I just set my bridge rules up for TS2/TG9 would I just set my radio up for the appropriate private call, then to select the reflector pick the private call, hit ptt, then switch radio back to TS2/TG9?
I feel like I'm missing something...?
Thank you again. I've really been enjoying this.
N1XBM Apparare Scientor Paratus Communicare Allstar Node # 27086, 41540, 41812, 42086, 42658
On Jan 24, 2016 7:52 PM, "Steve Zingman" <szingman@msgstor.com> wrote:
Working with BM is such fun. As I said. Tell him to set it up exactly like 311221 which is connected as we speak. It is DMRlink and is working fine.
On 01/24/2016 07:50 PM, Robert Newberry wrote:
Steve,
I was told to contact w4wwm he in turn told me to get on this openquad irc server. From there I talked to Rudy PD0RZY he was skeptical it would work and said I'd have lots of problems. I figured I'd better check back here. I will try what you advised.
Thanks
N1XBM Apparare Scientor Paratus Communicare Allstar Node # 27086, 41540, 41812, 42086, 42658
On Jan 24, 2016 4:58 PM, "Steve Zingman" <szingman@msgstor.com> wrote:
Yes it is possible. We are doing that on 2100. Contact your BM host and tell them to make it look like the connection from 311221 have this in your peer connection: AUTH_ENABLED = False AUTH_KEY:
Steve
On 01/24/2016 03:46 PM, Robert Newberry wrote:
Is it possible to have a connection to brandmeister using dmrlink?
_______________________________________________ Allstar-Digital mailing listAllstar-Digital@lists.keekles.orghttp://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/allstar-digital
-- "Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about." 1st Law of Logic
_______________________________________________ Allstar-Digital mailing list Allstar-Digital@lists.keekles.org http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/allstar-digital
_______________________________________________ Allstar-Digital mailing listAllstar-Digital@lists.keekles.orghttp://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/allstar-digital
-- "Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about." 1st Law of Logic
_______________________________________________ Allstar-Digital mailing list Allstar-Digital@lists.keekles.org http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/allstar-digital
_______________________________________________ Allstar-Digital mailing list Allstar-Digital@lists.keekles.org http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/allstar-digital
_______________________________________________ Allstar-Digital mailing listAllstar-Digital@lists.keekles.orghttp://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/allstar-digital
_______________________________________________ Allstar-Digital mailing list Allstar-Digital@lists.keekles.org http://lists.keekles.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/allstar-digital