I just tried it on 27468, entering *227722, then I ID'd using my hand held radio on each repeaters input (27468, then 27722), then back on 27468 I did *80, the cwid of 27468 went out on the air of both repeaters. These 2 systems do not share any hardware. Both are running the code downloaded after the Feb 9, 2012 updates. Chuck On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Alan Adamson <adamson_alan@hotmail.com>wrote:
it is, I'll have to see if I can't reproduce it and let you know.****
** **
Thanks for looking at it Jim!****
Alan****
** **
*From:* Jim Duuuude [mailto:telesistant@hotmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:23 AM *To:* app_rpt mailing list; adamson_alan@hotmail.com *Subject:* FW: [App_rpt-users] Quick question on usability****
** **
I have made good attempt at re-creating this problem, to no avail.
I have 2 nodes on a development server. 2007 and 2008. I can do a *22008 on 2007 and then do a *80 on 2007 and it only goes out on 2007. Is that the scenario that you were referring to?
JIM**** ------------------------------
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:31:22 -0400 From: jrorke@cogeco.ca CC: app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Quick question on usability
I have also observed that some ids in monitoring mode do get passed on as if I was connected in transceive mode.
I seem to remember that this has been like this for some time. I guess nobody posted it to the bugs page.
Jon VE3RQ
On 5/29/2012 1:13 PM, Jim Duuuude wrote: ****
No, normally (non-command) initiated ID's are always local.
The problem you are (most likely) seeing is that the command (the *80) in this case is getting re-distributed to all connected nodes in the normal manner, even though the link(s) is(are) connected in monitor-only mode.
Darn you for finding a design flaw!! :-)
I will attempt to verify that locally-initiated commands on a monitor-connected link get distributed. If they do, they wont for long.. :-)
JIM ** ****** ------------------------------
From: adamson_alan@hotmail.com To: App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:06:25 -0400 Subject: [App_rpt-users] Quick question on usability****
I don't want to be a bad operator at the moment… As I go about checking bandwidth and jitter, etc on my setup… I'd like to connect to an active Hub, but just in eavesdrop mode.****
But I've noticed that if I connect with the *2 command, that if I inadvertently then do a *80, that the ID goes out on the link that was connected with the *2.****
Is this true anytime my node decides to ID?****
Alan****
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users****
** ******
_______________________________________________****
App_rpt-users mailing list****
App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org****
http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users****
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users****
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users