Chan_simpleusb *DOES* support DTMF. All channel drivers do. Supporting it has nothing to do with the channel driver. Zaptel and app_rpt WONT RUN ON MOST LOW-END ARCHITECTURES. Especially the Blackfin and the MIPS. It wont work in a Linsys router. Also, Jon, remember that a load average of 1.2 on a dual-core system is only 60% of the CPU, *NOT* 120%. Im suprised that it was that loaded with 4 devices. It really shoudnt be. JIM
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 14:49:23 -0500 From: jrorke@cogeco.ca To: app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Beagleboard and USB URI dongle
So does this mean you can run App_rpt & Asterisk on the WRT 54GL????
Dont get me wrong, It would be great to run App_Rpt on the 54 GL. I have a number of them.
But how would you do a radio interface? I dont see any USB ports on any of my 54GLs.
I'm playing around with the Intel D510 MB with a 32 G SSD and have 3 Allstar nodes running on the board with URIs in full duplex with DSP Squelch and PL.
I had 4 on there and it seemed ok but the load ave hit 1.2! so I took out one node and now seems ok with the 3.
Perhaps using chan_simpleUSB might clear that up.
Nice low power package but cost a few bucks~($325 CDN) but solid package and yes there is a fan in the enclosure so heat doesnt seem to be a problem.
But I would like to know about what you had in mind on the 54GL.
Jon VA3RQ
On 2/15/2011 1:44 PM, Steve Gladden wrote:
Also Jim, THANK YOU! for creating this interface type.. There are many cases where I'd prefer NOT to do DSP on the PC /Board puter.
Especially when using older/smaller stuff.
Such as a WRT54GL
-Steve
chan_simpleusb is basically a 'gutted' version of chan_usbradio. It has no DSP functionality whatsoever. It is designed for radios that provide COR and/or CTCSS detection signals, and will run FAR more efficiently allowing for use on MUCH slower CPUs.
JIM WB6NIL
From: yokshs@sbcglobal.net To: app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:05:51 -0600 Subject: [App_rpt-users] Beagleboard and USB URI dongle
I'm curious about chan_simpleusb. Can it be used on a slower PC to improve performance?
I'm running 2 CM108 fobs here on a P3/866 MHz with 512MB ram. This was my old EchoIRLP node PC, and it seems to work ok for Allstar, but I realize that it's below the recommended CPU speed for a USB fob node.
My node radios have PL encode/decode in hardware, etc, so would I lose any functionality by switching to chan_simpleusb?
Thanks.73
Kyle K0KN --- Original Message ---Yes, it works quite beautifuly with the URI, in fact it will support 2 of them *BUT* only with chan_simpleusb. The CPU does not have the horsepower to do the DSP routines used in chan_usbradio.
Why dont you wait for the LOX board to become available in production? It wont be long.
JIM WB6NIL
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
Michigan Broadband Systems Inc. "Always Connected"
(734)527-7150
Steve's cellphone: (734)904-1811
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users