Are IRLP nodes listed with a preceding '8' ? The reason I ask is that the following showed up in a node listing ************************* CONNECTED NODES ************************* T27133, T29228, T29331, T29477, T29980, T89109 It would make sense that the 89109 was IRLP reflector 9109 If so I want to annotate that in my lsnodes script. 73 Doug WA3DSP http://www.crompton.com/hamradio
If I remember IRLP nodes embedded in Ap_Rpt were prefixed with a 4. This may simply be a private node perhaps? VA3RQ On 1/21/2014 2:44 AM, Doug Crompton wrote:
Are IRLP nodes listed with a preceding '8' ? The reason I ask is that the following showed up in a node listing
************************* CONNECTED NODES *************************
T27133, T29228, T29331, T29477, T29980, T89109
It would make sense that the 89109 was IRLP reflector 9109
If so I want to annotate that in my lsnodes script.
*73 Doug WA3DSP http://www.crompton.com/hamradio*
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button" You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
IRLP nodes did, indeed, used to be in the 4XXXXX range, until 2010 or whenever when Dave asked that IRLP no longer be supported by app_rpt. At which time I sold my IRLP board and pulled my IRLP node. (I will end there before going on to my usual grumbling about IRLP.) On Jan 21, 2014, at 6:54 AM, REDBUTTON_CTRL <jrorke@cogeco.ca> wrote:
If I remember IRLP nodes embedded in Ap_Rpt were prefixed with a 4.
This may simply be a private node perhaps?
VA3RQ
On 1/21/2014 2:44 AM, Doug Crompton wrote:
Are IRLP nodes listed with a preceding '8' ? The reason I ask is that the following showed up in a node listing
************************* CONNECTED NODES *************************
T27133, T29228, T29331, T29477, T29980, T89109
It would make sense that the 89109 was IRLP reflector 9109
If so I want to annotate that in my lsnodes script.
73 Doug WA3DSP http://www.crompton.com/hamradio
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list
App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button" You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
_______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users
To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button" You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem.
participants (3)
-
Buddy Brannan -
Doug Crompton -
REDBUTTON_CTRL