- App_rpt-users - lists.keekles.org

rpt.conf questions
by Geoff 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

So, I've got some defines ... ;****************** ;* Stanza Defines * ;vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv ; ;controlstates=controlstates29655 scheduler=schedule29655 morse=morse29657 macro=macro29655 functions=functions29655 phone_functions=functions29655 link_functions=functions29655 telemetry=telemetry29655 wait_times=wait-times29655 ; idtalkover=|iW5OMR R unlinkedct=ct2 ;Courtesy tone sound the node makes when not linked remotect=ct3 ;Courtesy tone sound the node makes when linked linkunkeyct=ct8 ;Courtesy tone sound the node makes when a remote linked system unkeys nolocallinkct=0 eannmode=2 echolinkdefault=0 echolinkdynamic=0 nounkeyct=0 telemdefault=2 ;temetry mode ; 0 = telemetry output off, ; 1 = telemetry output on, ; 2 = timed telemetry output on command execution and for a short time thereafter specifically, at this time, I'm concerned about Courtesy tones. So, let's go down to the telemetry stanza for 29655... [telemetry29655] ; ;when NOT linked ct2=|t(0,0,10,0)(350,440,10,2048)(0,0,10,0)(350,440,10,2048)(0,0,10,0)(350,440,10,2048)(0,0,10,0)(350,440,100,2048) ; ;when Linked ct3=|t(0,0,10,0)(880,440,150,2048)(0,0,10,0)(440,660,150,2048)(0,0,10,0)(880,440,150,2048)(0,0,10,0)(440,660,150,2048) ; ct4=|t(550,0,150,1048)(550,0,150,1048) ct5=|t(660,0,150,2048) ct6=|t(880,0,150,2048) ct7=|t(660,440,150,2048) ; When remote link unkeys ct8=|t(0,0,10,0)(350,440,50,2048)(0,0,50,0)(880,440,50,2048)(0,0,50,0)(350,440,50,2048) ; ct9=|t(660,680,100,4000)(0,0,100,0)(660,680,100,1000)(0,0,100,0)(660,680,100,250) remotetx=|t(500,0,10,1048)(0,0,10,0)(1000,0,10,1048) remotemon=|t(1009,0,50,2048) cmdmode=|icm ;(220,247,262,294,330,350,392,2048) functcomplete=|iEN patchup=rpt/callproceeding patchdown=rpt/callterminated ; ; ; This section allows wait times for telemetry events to be adjusted ; A section for wait times can be defined for every repeater ; [wait-times29655] telemwait=150 idwait=10 unkeywait=650 calltermwait=150 but, regardless of how I change the CT's, it remains the same, when asterisk is stopped and restarted, even when the machine is rebooted, the courtesy tone remains the same.

5 7

best board/embedded computer for home node?
by James Lyles 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

I am going to an allstarlink node and know that the Beagleboard-xM and Beaglebone Black are in use currently with nodes. However, I saw the new Raspberry Pi 2 announcement today, it’s a quad core ARM v7 chip, 1 gb RAM, and still $35. What would be people’s recommendation to make my first node with an embedded type system for home experimentation? Thanks, James AB2WS

3 2

Re: [App_rpt-users] Asterisk RF Gateway via Satellite
by Technology Frontier | TF.OPS2 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

Yes, VoIP over satellite really is viable. Technology has definitely changed over the past 10 years, some of the satellites actually have the router / switch built-in which helps a lot. So far we haven't had anyone mention "the 30 minute delay" where the connection would disappear and then come back right at the point where it left off. Both of the primary satellite ISPs (HughesNet and Viasat Exede) offer IP Phone services, if VoIP wasn't viable I doubt they would want the additional support headaches to deal with. There's still the problem with inbound traffic being blocked when there's no client initiated connection (another PBX / RF Gateway or proxy takes care of this problem though). Mars - N0PCO On 02/03/2015 07:39 AM, Bill South wrote: > Is VoIP over satellite really viable? The company I worked for a number of years ago did some VoIP over satellite Internet connections and the delays due to latency was so bad it simply wasn't a useable option for us. Has the technology changed in the last 10 years to make this doable? Anyone doing VoIP over a satellite Internet connection have some feedback, would be interesting to hear about?

1 0

allmon
by jimmy keffer 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

where can i find info on installing allmon on my new acid box thanks jimmy ka3vgm

2 2

Asterisk RF Gateway via Satellite
by Technology Frontier | TF.OPS2 03 Feb '15

03 Feb '15

Hello App_Rpt Group, currently using Viasat's Exede for Internet services and need to find out how to set up a Asterisk RF Gateway proxy in order to alleviate the inbound connection problem (outbound initiated connections work great, inbound connections never make it past the NOC firewall). Would setting up a couple of private nodes at a server farm be beneficial? Thank You in advance. Mars - N0PCO

3 2

Re: [App_rpt-users] Asterisk RF Gateway via Satellite
by Doug Crompton 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

Well iax re-registers once a minute and there is tons of status traffic outbound on a busy node. You could just stay connected (permanan connect) to some outside hub and tell people to connect to you there. Then if you want to go private you can connect directly to them. I am sure there are plenty of nodes that would allow you to do that. I have one here if you are looking for a place. 73 Doug WA3DSP http://www.crompton.com/hamradio > Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 22:07:38 -0600 > From: tf.ops2(a)gmail.com > To: doug(a)crompton.com > Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] Asterisk RF Gateway via Satellite > > Inbound traffic (all ports) are blocked, unless there is originating > contact (such as registration - which works with SIP, but no such luck > with IAX2 yet). > > On 02/02/2015 10:02 PM, Doug Crompton wrote: > > Is it s specific port or ports that are firewalled? You can change 4569 IAX to whatever port# you want that isn't well know or being used. > > > > 73 Doug > > WA3DSP > > http://www.crompton.com/hamradio > > > > > >> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 21:39:40 -0600 > >> From: tf.ops2(a)gmail.com > >> To: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org > >> Subject: [App_rpt-users] Asterisk RF Gateway via Satellite > >> > >> Hello App_Rpt Group, currently using Viasat's Exede for Internet > >> services and need to find out how to set up a Asterisk RF Gateway proxy > >> in order to alleviate the inbound connection problem (outbound initiated > >> connections work great, inbound connections never make it past the NOC > >> firewall). Would setting up a couple of private nodes at a server farm > >> be beneficial? Thank You in advance. > >> > >> Mars - N0PCO > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> App_rpt-users mailing list > >> App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org > >> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this list please visit http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users and scroll down to the bottom of the page. Enter your email address and press the "Unsubscribe or edit options button" > >> You do not need a password to unsubscribe, you can do it via email confirmation. If you have trouble unsubscribing, please send a message to the list detailing the problem. > >> > > > >

1 0

HP5740e Thin Client Loading Lock-Up: Update 1
by Chris Hill - K7AZ 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

Here is what was discovered so far: Subbing a SATA SSD for the 4GB Flash Drive did not help. Getting the latest CentOS ISO image did not help. Did not try expanding RAM. Debugging was done by pressing “I" after the CentOS started loading and typing “N" for the CPUSPEEDADJ allowed loading of ACID. This particular HP TC needs a slight tweak to the kernel and re-compiling. More later on Update 2. 73 Chris / K7AZ Node 29275 & Others

1 0

new install
by jimmy keffer 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

i'm tryong 2 setup server/node in data center every time i try use s static ip the install dies anyone seen this using acid iso? jimmy

3 2

ECHO Echo echo ...
by Geoff 02 Feb '15

02 Feb '15

Weirdness sat in yesterday evening... and even after everything was powered off, unplugged, connections tightened, wires checked and rechecked, computer was 'shutdown -h now', unplugged, caps drained, etc... restarted everything and all seemed cool, locally. So, I have 29655 (UHF repeater, usbradio; no-dsp), 29656 (echolink - no hardware) and 29657 (vhf simplex node, TMV-7a using the packet port, 9600-baud [discriminator audio], ctcss from DSP) and all of a sudden, the 2m node went ballistic. Did the resets, made sure the node was on the right frequency, etc, and again, this morning, there was 'echoing' every time the 2m node was unkeyed. Sounded like acoustical feedback. Weirdness! so... (on uhf) *129657. Have a friend on the other side of town - 2 systems linked together. Dialed the uhf node to friends node. Dialed the vhf rig to the same node ... no echo. I let it stay like that about a half hour and just now, on vhf disconnected from my friends link, and reconnected 29657 (vhf simplex node) to 29655 (uhf repeater - both nodes on same computer) and ... NO ECHO. Why? -Geoff/W5OMR

2 2

Unfamiliar Error
by Steve Agee 01 Feb '15

01 Feb '15

Anyone familiar with this error appearing on a node? WARNING[7779]: channel.c:944 ast_queue_frame: Unable to write to alert pipe on (null), frametype/subclass 5/0 (qlen = 2): Bad file descriptor! -- Re-Loading config for repeater 29864 -- Re-Loading config for repeater 1099 -- Re-Loading config for repeater 29863 N5ZUA

3 3