- App_rpt-users - lists.keekles.org

Ok..simple DMK interface....
by Bryan D. Boyle 20 Feb '11

20 Feb '11

So...I'm going to show stupidity here. Nothing new...so bear with me, please. Anyway...looking to use the DMK dongle to key a radio whose PTT is a simple key to ground. Think normal HF or vhf rig like a 7900 or even a KenYaeCom HT, where the ptt basically closes a circuit. Hooking up a meter between ground (pin 20) and pin 1 (PTT) on the DMK, and issuing a command to key the dongle gives me close to a 0 ohm reading, but not quite; still at about 10 ohms. (and I know how to hook up a meter...fwiw, it's a simpson 260, not a digital, so, I can see the needle swing...). This obviously is not what I'm looking for. Yes, I know what the circuit is rated for (not much) and it's an open collector... So, the question is...is this pin basically a contact closure (which IS what I'm looking for), or some other logic level that I'll have to convert? If so...any pointers or ? I freely admit that digital logic (or lack thereof...) especially at this level (pretty basic, huh?) escapes me...but am willing to learn. TIA. Bryan WB0YLE Allstar 27294/27295 Echolink WB0YLE-R

2 2

Parallel Port IO Board?
by K&R Yoksh 19 Feb '11

19 Feb '11

My formatting was destroyed in that last email, sorry... Here is the URL again: http://www.qsl.net/k0kn/plri.html

1 0

Parallel port IO board?
by K&R Yoksh 19 Feb '11

19 Feb '11

Hello Pete,I designed a 3rd party IRLP board a few years ago, and published the designs on my web site:http://www.qsl.net/k0kn/plri.htmlI am using two of these on app_rpt with good results. The hardware DTMF decoder is not supported by app_rpt however.I'm not sure how app_rpt would handle using one parallel port for multiple nodes though. I've not tried to define parallel port pins for more than one node on a server. My parallel port definitions from usbradio.conf:; IRLP board supportpp3 = ptt ; out0, out1 or ptt; pp10 = in ; in, cor or ctcss; pp12 = in ; pins 10,12,13,15 are for DTMF; pp13 = in ; pp15 = in pp11 = cor; pp4 = out0 ; pins 4,5,6 are AUX 1,2,3, default off; pp5 = out0 ; pp6 = out0 73..KyleK0KN--- Original Message ---Hi All, Is there a circuit board design for running COS/PTT for multiple radios off the parallel port? It would make using consumer FOBs much simpler. It would need some PTT drivers and COS buffers. I thought there might be a cactus board or 3rd party IRLP board that may already in circulation. Pete

1 0

Node not showing up on active list
by K&R Yoksh 19 Feb '11

19 Feb '11

Hello group, An odd thing happened a few days ago. One of my 6 nodes no longer appears on the Allstar active nodes list http://stats.allstarlink.org/ Nothing has changed on my end. I've made sure that the stanza for node status reporting is uncommented in rpt.conf. This server is running 3 nodes, 2210-2212 and 2210,2212 show up. The node reporting stanzas are identical on all 3 nodes. I can use 2211 as before, it will successfully connect to other stations, etc, but does not display correctly if connected to another station. For example, I connected 2211 to my node 2215. Node 2211 appears to be a non-standard node. See URL: http://stats.allstarlink.org/nodeinfo.cgi?node=2215 Any ideas? I'm stumped. Thanks. 73 Kyle K0KN

2 1

New device available
by Jim Duuuude 18 Feb '11

18 Feb '11

If you have an repeater with an existing controller that you wish to continue using, and you also want to have app_rpt/Allstar functionality, but don't have any open ports (either because the controller only has 1 port, or all the ports are taken), you might be interested in this: https://allstarlink.org/santiago.html JIM WB6NIL

1 0

Parallel port IO board?
by Peter Elke 18 Feb '11

18 Feb '11

Hi All, Is there a circuit board design for running COS/PTT for multiple radios off the parallel port? It would make using consumer FOBs much simpler. It would need some PTT drivers and COS buffers. I thought there might be a cactus board or 3rd party IRLP board that may already in circulation. Pete

2 1

permanent echolink connection
by Bryan D. Boyle 18 Feb '11

18 Feb '11

I've been asked by a group who's thinking of linking a couple machines...and was considering using Asterisk for one radio, whether it is possible to connect, on a full-time basis, an asterisk node on one radio to an echolink node that lives on a second repeater. For instance...Repeater Allstar node A <--> Echolink node on Repeater B I realize that they could change out the Echolink to a asterisk and permlink the two, but, they're a bit nonplussed with the lag between end users logging into echo and the database download. Yeah, whiny users, but what can you do? Looked through the mailing list archives....basically, I'm thinking, almost like a permlink between two app_rpt boxen. Am I missing something here? Thanx. -- Bryan In this world, you must be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant. You may quote me.

3 2

Beagleboard and USB URI dongle
by K&R Yoksh 17 Feb '11

17 Feb '11

>BTW- runing full duplex chan_usbradio on a Pentium-3 733MHz box >I see 10%CPU continuous (RX) with spikes up to 25-30% during TX-RX-DTMF >useage >That's with Top runing at a 20 sample per second rate (which eats some CPU >itself mind you. >This seems to suggest that an 'ol Pentium-3 can cut it for this app. > Somebody please beat me with a baseball bat if I'm wrong!! I had similar results with my P3/866, but I was hoping that a faster processor might help to eliminate the occasional "stumble" I've noticed with Allstar. Especially at the beginning of telemetry or user audio, the audio will sometimes glitch. It occasionally happens with user audio also. I've not noticed that before when I ran an IRLP or EchoIRLP system. I'm not sure if it's a USB-related phenomenon, since my previous systems have used analog sound cards, rather than USB fobs. If nodes with faster processors also have that issue, then I won't spend any more time or energy trying to upgrade my PC, or change to simpleusb, etc. I'll just live with it. I figured that if the Simpleusb would be less processor-hungry, maybe that would minimize the glitches? 73. Kyle K0KN --- Original Message --->>>also seems that the parallel port support isn't included in simpleusb? Can you confirm this? Might be really easy to get it. I'll certainly be wanting to do this. :-) I'm still getting free Pentium III 1U rack serves lately :-) Which are quite sexy looking and convenient to use for this. The used 1U Quad Xeons I purchase are going for about $850. hihi BTW- runing full duplex chan_usbradio on a Pentium-3 733MHz box I see 10%CPU continuous (RX) with spikes up to 25-30% during TX-RX-DTMF useage That's with Top runing at a 20 sample per second rate (which eats some CPU itself mind you. This seems to suggest that an 'ol Pentium-3 can cut it for this app. Somebody please beat me with a baseball bat if I'm wrong!!

5 7

900 Mhz Stuff
by Jim Duuuude 17 Feb '11

17 Feb '11

I was going thru a bunch of stuff I have in storage and found a box containing 10 900Mhz 350 W 2 stage circulators and 3 or 4 900Mhz duplexers and 4 or 5 900Mhz Larsen NMO mount mobile 900Mhz antennas. I think I also have a Spectra on 900Mhz somewhere also. I would like to sell this stuff, if anyone is interested. JIM WB6NIL \

1 0

Re: [App_rpt-users] Beagleboard and USB URI dongle
by Steve Gladden 16 Feb '11

16 Feb '11

OK so do I have it correct? chan_simpleusb * Does not do carrier detect (via DSP noise detection) must use COR logic. * Does not do CTSCC Decode (obviously). * DTMF is handled by Zaptel so we still decode DTMF in asterisk. * encode functions are same as before? * enabling/using it is by simply specifyinfg it in rpt.conf rxchannel = SimpleUSB/usb and the presense and setup of simpleusb.conf Thanks! Steve -Steve > >> So does this mean you can run App_rpt & Asterisk on the WRT 54GL???? > No! :-) > > it only means I have an idea and was using that as an exaple on where > something like the simplesb channel driver might come in handy. > > > > >> >> Dont get me wrong, It would be great to run App_Rpt on the 54 GL. I have >> a number of them. >> >> But how would you do a radio interface? I dont see any USB ports on any >> of my 54GLs. > > There's not. > > > >> >> I'm playing around with the Intel D510 MB with a 32 G SSD and have 3 >> Allstar nodes running on the board with URIs in full duplex with DSP >> Squelch and PL. >> >> I had 4 on there and it seemed ok but the load ave hit 1.2! so I took >> out one node and now seems ok with the 3. >> >> Perhaps using chan_simpleUSB might clear that up. >> >> Nice low power package but cost a few bucks~($325 CDN) but solid package >> and yes there is a fan in the enclosure so heat doesnt seem to be a >> problem. >> >> But I would like to know about what you had in mind on the 54GL. > > All that I had in mind at this point was looking into it. :-) > As I have som many of them around here. > > :-) > > -Steve > > > > > >> >> Jon VA3RQ >> >> >> >> >> On 2/15/2011 1:44 PM, Steve Gladden wrote: >>> Also Jim, THANK YOU! for creating this interface type.. >>> There are many cases where I'd prefer NOT to do DSP on the PC /Board >>> puter. >>> >>> Especially when using older/smaller stuff. >>> >>> Such as a WRT54GL >>> >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> chan_simpleusb is basically a 'gutted' version of chan_usbradio. It >>>> has >>>> no >>>> DSP functionality whatsoever. >>>> It is designed for radios that provide COR and/or CTCSS detection >>>> signals, >>>> and will run FAR more efficiently >>>> allowing for use on MUCH slower CPUs. >>>> >>>> JIM WB6NIL >>>> >>>> From: yokshs(a)sbcglobal.net >>>> To: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org >>>> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:05:51 -0600 >>>> Subject: [App_rpt-users] Beagleboard and USB URI dongle >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm curious about chan_simpleusb. Can it be used on a slower PC to >>>> improve >>>> performance? >>>> >>>> I'm running 2 CM108 fobs here on a P3/866 MHz with 512MB ram. This was >>>> my >>>> old EchoIRLP node PC, and it seems to >>>> work ok for Allstar, but I realize that it's below the recommended CPU >>>> speed for a USB fob node. >>>> >>>> My node radios have PL encode/decode in hardware, etc, so would I lose >>>> any >>>> functionality by switching to chan_simpleusb? >>>> >>>> Thanks.73 >>>> >>>> Kyle >>>> K0KN >>>> --- Original Message ---Yes, it works quite beautifuly with the URI, >>>> in >>>> fact it will support 2 of them >>>> *BUT* only with chan_simpleusb. The CPU does not have the horsepower >>>> to do the DSP routines used in chan_usbradio. >>>> >>>> Why dont you wait for the LOX board to become available in production? >>>> It wont be long. >>>> >>>> JIM WB6NIL >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> App_rpt-users mailing list >>>> App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org >>>> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users >>>> -- >>>> This message has been scanned for viruses and >>>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>>> believed to be clean. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> App_rpt-users mailing list >>>> App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org >>>> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users >>>> >>> >>> Michigan Broadband Systems Inc. >>> "Always Connected" >>> >>> (734)527-7150 >>> >>> Steve's cellphone: (734)904-1811 >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> App_rpt-users mailing list >> App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org >> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> believed to be clean. >> > > > Michigan Broadband Systems Inc. > "Always Connected" > > (734)527-7150 > > Steve's cellphone: (734)904-1811 > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt-users mailing list > App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org > http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users > Michigan Broadband Systems Inc. "Always Connected" (734)527-7150 Steve's cellphone: (734)904-1811 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

4 7