October 2012 - App_rpt-users - lists.keekles.org

Re: [App_rpt-users] thought
by Bryan D. Boyle 08 Oct '12

08 Oct '12

On 10/7/2012 5:17 PM, Scott Weis wrote: > Yes OK...define in the telemetry section or in the node stanza? fully qualified path or relative to /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/

2 1

thought
by Bryan D. Boyle 07 Oct '12

07 Oct '12

or question...about courtesy tones... Is it possible to use a ulaw or wav or whatever audio file as the CT rather than plain tone sequences? Just spitballing... BB'

1 0

Re: [App_rpt-users] App_rpt-users Digest, Vol 44, Issue 11
by Edward talaro Talaro 07 Oct '12

07 Oct '12

Hi my name is Ed call sign NH6WT from Hilo Hawaii i had the same problem before has been corrected, i had another eye to correct it check your, disable and enale unnesscessary setting in the BIOS setting... my BIOS been correct from that time on i have no problems...... cheers 73 ________________________________ From: "app_rpt-users-request(a)ohnosec.org" <app_rpt-users-request(a)ohnosec.org> To: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2012 6:00 AM Subject: App_rpt-users Digest, Vol 44, Issue 11 Send App_rpt-users mailing list submissions to app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to app_rpt-users-request(a)ohnosec.org You can reach the person managing the list at app_rpt-users-owner(a)ohnosec.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of App_rpt-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: mpg123: no process killed - Asterisk endedwith exit status 1 (Lu Vencl) 2. Error mpg123 etc. (Ian Wilson) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 08:09:54 -0400 From: Lu Vencl <vencl(a)att.net> To: Steve Agee <n5zua(a)earthlink.net> Cc: "<app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org>" <app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org> Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] mpg123: no process killed - Asterisk endedwith exit status 1 Message-ID: <EC2A6F5E-8FEE-472B-9775-4B0B1569B7C4(a)att.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="cp932" I don't have Jim's email in this phone and I am traveling this weekend. Can someone fwd this concern to him? Unless of course he is monitoring this list then that would not be necessary. Thanks Lu KA4EPS Sent from my iPhone, Lu Vencl On Oct 6, 2012, at 1:44 AM, "Steve Agee" <n5zua(a)earthlink.net> wrote: > I'm having this issue as well on a fresh install. The machine is 64 bit: > > [Oct 5 22:42:47] ERROR[23279] asterisk.c: Asterisk has detected a problem with your Zaptel configuration and will shutdown for your protection. You have options: > 1. You only have to compile Zaptel support into Asterisk if you need it. One option is to recompile without Zaptel support. > 2. You only have to load Zaptel drivers if you want to take advantage of Zaptel services. One option is to unload zaptel modules if you don't need them. > 3. If you need Zaptel services, you must correctly configure Zaptel. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > > N5ZUA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Scott Weis > To: 'Lu Vencl' ; app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 9:23 PM > Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] mpg123: no process killed - Asterisk endedwith exit status 1 > > Your system most likely updated it?s kernel.. So you need to rebuild/install zaptel. > > From: app_rpt-users-bounces(a)ohnosec.org [mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org] On Behalf Of Lu Vencl > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 9:42 PM > To: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org > Subject: [App_rpt-users] mpg123: no process killed - Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > > Anyone know why a new node I just built goes through several of these before settling down after a reboot? > I have hear this complaint from someone else before, but he can?t remember what he did to fix his node. > Thanks > Lu > KA4EPS > > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > mpg123: no process killed > Asterisk ended with exit status 1 > Asterisk died with code 1. > Automatically restarting Asterisk. > _______________________________________________ > App_rpt-users mailing list > App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org > http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

1 0

Error mpg123 etc.
by Ian Wilson 07 Oct '12

07 Oct '12

This is my experience of the error and how I cured it. I found that after making a change and downloading the server configuration I would get the error. Over-writing my [ rpt.conf ] with one from a known working configuration cured it. Changes I made to the server configuration was to add/remove Echolink connectivity. I also found that by including another node the error appeared. This was due to the downloaded [rpt.conf] file not having the second node stanza inserted after the [ ;***Status Reporting *** ] portion of [ rpt.conf ] Manually setting [ rpt.conf ] with the two node stanzas first then followed by [morse] [schedule] [functions] etc cured it. I'm new to this so if this is already known apologies for repeating it.. Ian.. 28818 28934

1 0

Re: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge
by Jeffrey S. Carrier 06 Oct '12

06 Oct '12

Thank you Tim! As soon as I get a day off I'll try it. ________________________________ From: Tim Sawyer [mailto:tim.sawyer@mac.com] Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:32 PM To: Jeffrey S. Carrier Cc: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge I have some new info on this. First, radbridge is not better than a permanent connection of your nodes. Radbridge is intended for systems that don't use app_rpt, systems that are not allstar nodes. So you probably can't use it as it will likely conflict with app_rpt. Secondly, radbridge has never been used anywhere except between a couple of test systems. You're really on the bleeding edge. Having said that, here's how it is set up. In usbradio.conf (or simpleusb.conf as appropriate) add a stanza. The stanza can be a string of letters or numbers or both, [foo99] or [foobar] for example. Nothing needs to be under the stanza. Configuration of three radios might look like this: On system #1 usbradio.conf [foo1] On system #2 usbradio.conf [foo2] On System #3 usbradio.conf [foo3] radbridge.conf [general] instance1 = Radio/foo1, Radio/foo2, Radio/foo3 -- Tim :wq On Oct 4, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Tim Sawyer <tim.sawyer(a)mac.com> wrote: Ok, then I'm out of ideas. Hopefully someone else will jump in here to help out. -- Tim :wq On Oct 4, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Jeffrey S. Carrier <jeff.carrier(a)rmsmsecurity.com> wrote: Yes, yes and yes ________________________________ From: Tim Sawyer [mailto:tisawyer@gmail.com <http://gmail.com/> ] On Behalf Of Tim Sawyer Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 2:39 PM To: Jeffrey S. Carrier Cc: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge Are you using chan_usbradio? Are those private nodes able to connect to each other with regular connects, ie *31970? Do you have current source? -- Tim :wq On Oct 4, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Jeffrey S. Carrier <jeff.carrier(a)rmsmsecurity.com> wrote: I did see that. I actually tried something like this: [general] instance1 = Radio/1970,Radio/1971,Radio/1975 To no avail, it caused asterisk to crash. ________________________________ From: Tim Sawyer [mailto:tisawyer@gmail.com <http://gmail.com/> ] On Behalf Of Tim Sawyer Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 1:34 PM To: Jeffrey S. Carrier Cc: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge Never used it myself but this comment from the source might be helpful: /* This application is intended to provide a generic "bridging" functionality for radio-oriented Asterisk channels. The idea here is that certain radio applications lend themselves to needing a "generic" (passes audio and tx/rx keying completely transparently) to and from two or more endpoints. An example of such an appication might be replacing (or providing equivlent new functionaliy of) one or more full-duplex UHF control links with an IP-based one(s). app_radbridge allows multiple instances of radio-oriented channels transparently "bridged" together. The config file (radbridge.conf) allows specification of each "bridging" instance and what radio-oriented Asterisk channels are to be associated with it. There is no need for any other specificaiton of configuration. The file format for radbridge.conf departs somewhat from the standard usage (at least for radio stuff) of the Asterisk config file architecture. In most other radio-oriented cases, an instance of whatever it is gets defined as a "Stanza" in the config file. In this case, because of limitations in the way that Asterisk parses config files, that was not possible. Instead, all config information goes into the [general] stanza, and each line of config info defines a different instance of radio bridging. For example: [general] instance1 = Voter/1234,Radio/5678 instance2 = Voter/1235,Radio/5679 This example would define two radio bridging instances "instance1" and "instance2", each with 2 channels associated with them. The supported channel types are "Voter" (chan_voter), "Radio" (chan_usbradio), "SimpleUsb" (chan_simpleusb), and "Zap" ("Dahdi") (chan_dahdi, for the couple of devices that use this channel driver, such as the PCIRadio card, and separate analog channels using an ARIB board or such). Rather then "adding" (which would actually be a lot of *removing* optionally) this functionality in app_rpt, it made more sense to create a separate application specifically for this purpose. In addition, this allows for a system that is merely provided for doing this bridging application and nothing else radio-oriented, to not have to run app_rpt at all. */ -- Tim :wq On Oct 4, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Jeffrey S. Carrier <jeff.carrier(a)rmsmsecurity.com> wrote: I actually meant "radbridge" sorry for the typos ________________________________ From: app_rpt-users-bounces(a)ohnosec.org <mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org> [mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org <mailto:users-bounces@ohnosec.org> ] On Behalf Of Jeffrey S. Carrier Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:04 AM To: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org <mailto:app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org> Subject: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge I'm probably missing something but I can seem to find the answer anywhere so I thought I'd turn to the experts. Can rptbridge be used to bridge say 3 different nodes on 3 different servers which are all on the same LAN? I have them set up to do a permanent connection and didn't know if this might be a better way. Thanks, Jeff KØJSC _______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org <mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users <http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users> _______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users _______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

1 0

DTMF Commands not processed?
by Kevin Oleniczak 06 Oct '12

06 Oct '12

Should i be able to see dtmf digits received by a URI device in the CLI? I'm having trouble getting app_rpt to respond to commands over the air? I only see carrier detect related messages with asterisk -rvvvvvvvvv when i key a radio. [Oct 6 13:35:10] NOTICE[23041]: chan_usbradio.c:2845 usbradio_read: rxcarrierdetect = 1, chan Radio/usb [Oct 6 13:35:15] NOTICE[23041]: chan_usbradio.c:2845 usbradio_read: rxcarrierdetect = 0, chan Radio/usb I've already ran setup commands for rxnoise and rxvoice, etc... tx audio sounds good along with PTT. Here's my usbradio.conf. I'm using speaker output of a radio for now. thanks for any suggestions. [usb] hdwtype=1 ; Leave this set to 0 for USB sound fobs modified using ; the instructions from usbfob.pdf. Use a setting of ; 1 is for Dingotel/Sph interfaces. rxboost=1 ; 0 = 20db attenuator inserted, 1= 20db attenuator removed ; Set to 1 for additonal gain if using a low-level receiver output rxctcssrelax=1 ; reduce talkoff from radios w/o CTCSS Tx HPF ; Do not change this, leave this as a 1 txctcssdefault=100.0 ; default tx ctcss freq, any frequency permitted rxctcssfreqs=100.0 ; rx ctcss freqs in floating point. must be in table txctcssfreqs=100.0 ; tx ctcss freqs, any frequency permitted ;rxctcssoverride=0 ; Set to 1 or yes to start out in carrier squelch mode carrierfrom=vox ; no,usb,usbinvert,dsp,vox ; no - no carrier detection at all ; usb - from the COR line on the modified USB sound fob ; usbinvert - from the inverted COR line on the modified USB sound fob ; dsp - from RX noise using dsp techniques ; vox - voice activated from RX audio ctcssfrom=dsp ; no,usb,dsp ; no - CTCSS decoding, system will be carrier squelch ; usb - CTCSS decoding using input from USB FOB ; (currently not supported) ; dsp - CTCSS decoding using RX audio in DSP. ; rxdemod option must be set to flat for this to work. rxdemod=speaker ; input type from radio: no,speaker,flat ; no - RX audio input not used ; flat - Use RX audio from discriminator (before de-emphasis)

1 0

Re: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge
by Jeffrey S. Carrier 04 Oct '12

04 Oct '12

Yes, yes and yes ________________________________ From: Tim Sawyer [mailto:tisawyer@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Sawyer Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 2:39 PM To: Jeffrey S. Carrier Cc: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge Are you using chan_usbradio? Are those private nodes able to connect to each other with regular connects, ie *31970? Do you have current source? -- Tim :wq On Oct 4, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Jeffrey S. Carrier <jeff.carrier(a)rmsmsecurity.com> wrote: I did see that. I actually tried something like this: [general] instance1 = Radio/1970,Radio/1971,Radio/1975 To no avail, it caused asterisk to crash. ________________________________ From: Tim Sawyer [mailto:tisawyer@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Sawyer Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 1:34 PM To: Jeffrey S. Carrier Cc: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge Never used it myself but this comment from the source might be helpful: /* This application is intended to provide a generic "bridging" functionality for radio-oriented Asterisk channels. The idea here is that certain radio applications lend themselves to needing a "generic" (passes audio and tx/rx keying completely transparently) to and from two or more endpoints. An example of such an appication might be replacing (or providing equivlent new functionaliy of) one or more full-duplex UHF control links with an IP-based one(s). app_radbridge allows multiple instances of radio-oriented channels transparently "bridged" together. The config file (radbridge.conf) allows specification of each "bridging" instance and what radio-oriented Asterisk channels are to be associated with it. There is no need for any other specificaiton of configuration. The file format for radbridge.conf departs somewhat from the standard usage (at least for radio stuff) of the Asterisk config file architecture. In most other radio-oriented cases, an instance of whatever it is gets defined as a "Stanza" in the config file. In this case, because of limitations in the way that Asterisk parses config files, that was not possible. Instead, all config information goes into the [general] stanza, and each line of config info defines a different instance of radio bridging. For example: [general] instance1 = Voter/1234,Radio/5678 instance2 = Voter/1235,Radio/5679 This example would define two radio bridging instances "instance1" and "instance2", each with 2 channels associated with them. The supported channel types are "Voter" (chan_voter), "Radio" (chan_usbradio), "SimpleUsb" (chan_simpleusb), and "Zap" ("Dahdi") (chan_dahdi, for the couple of devices that use this channel driver, such as the PCIRadio card, and separate analog channels using an ARIB board or such). Rather then "adding" (which would actually be a lot of *removing* optionally) this functionality in app_rpt, it made more sense to create a separate application specifically for this purpose. In addition, this allows for a system that is merely provided for doing this bridging application and nothing else radio-oriented, to not have to run app_rpt at all. */ -- Tim :wq On Oct 4, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Jeffrey S. Carrier <jeff.carrier(a)rmsmsecurity.com> wrote: I actually meant "radbridge" sorry for the typos ________________________________ From: app_rpt-users-bounces(a)ohnosec.org <mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org> [mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org <mailto:users-bounces@ohnosec.org> ] On Behalf Of Jeffrey S. Carrier Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:04 AM To: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org <mailto:app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org> Subject: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge I'm probably missing something but I can seem to find the answer anywhere so I thought I'd turn to the experts. Can rptbridge be used to bridge say 3 different nodes on 3 different servers which are all on the same LAN? I have them set up to do a permanent connection and didn't know if this might be a better way. Thanks, Jeff KØJSC _______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org <mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users <http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users> _______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users

1 0

Re: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge
by Jeffrey S. Carrier 04 Oct '12

04 Oct '12

I did see that. I actually tried something like this: [general] instance1 = Radio/1970,Radio/1971,Radio/1975 To no avail, it caused asterisk to crash. ________________________________ From: Tim Sawyer [mailto:tisawyer@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Tim Sawyer Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 1:34 PM To: Jeffrey S. Carrier Cc: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org Subject: Re: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge Never used it myself but this comment from the source might be helpful: /* This application is intended to provide a generic "bridging" functionality for radio-oriented Asterisk channels. The idea here is that certain radio applications lend themselves to needing a "generic" (passes audio and tx/rx keying completely transparently) to and from two or more endpoints. An example of such an appication might be replacing (or providing equivlent new functionaliy of) one or more full-duplex UHF control links with an IP-based one(s). app_radbridge allows multiple instances of radio-oriented channels transparently "bridged" together. The config file (radbridge.conf) allows specification of each "bridging" instance and what radio-oriented Asterisk channels are to be associated with it. There is no need for any other specificaiton of configuration. The file format for radbridge.conf departs somewhat from the standard usage (at least for radio stuff) of the Asterisk config file architecture. In most other radio-oriented cases, an instance of whatever it is gets defined as a "Stanza" in the config file. In this case, because of limitations in the way that Asterisk parses config files, that was not possible. Instead, all config information goes into the [general] stanza, and each line of config info defines a different instance of radio bridging. For example: [general] instance1 = Voter/1234,Radio/5678 instance2 = Voter/1235,Radio/5679 This example would define two radio bridging instances "instance1" and "instance2", each with 2 channels associated with them. The supported channel types are "Voter" (chan_voter), "Radio" (chan_usbradio), "SimpleUsb" (chan_simpleusb), and "Zap" ("Dahdi") (chan_dahdi, for the couple of devices that use this channel driver, such as the PCIRadio card, and separate analog channels using an ARIB board or such). Rather then "adding" (which would actually be a lot of *removing* optionally) this functionality in app_rpt, it made more sense to create a separate application specifically for this purpose. In addition, this allows for a system that is merely provided for doing this bridging application and nothing else radio-oriented, to not have to run app_rpt at all. */ -- Tim :wq On Oct 4, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Jeffrey S. Carrier <jeff.carrier(a)rmsmsecurity.com> wrote: I actually meant "radbridge" sorry for the typos ________________________________ From: app_rpt-users-bounces(a)ohnosec.org <mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org> [mailto:app_rpt-users-bounces@ohnosec.org <mailto:users-bounces@ohnosec.org> ] On Behalf Of Jeffrey S. Carrier Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 10:04 AM To: app_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org <mailto:app_rpt-users@ohnosec.org> Subject: [App_rpt-users] rptbridge I'm probably missing something but I can seem to find the answer anywhere so I thought I'd turn to the experts. Can rptbridge be used to bridge say 3 different nodes on 3 different servers which are all on the same LAN? I have them set up to do a permanent connection and didn't know if this might be a better way. Thanks, Jeff KØJSC _______________________________________________ App_rpt-users mailing list App_rpt-users(a)ohnosec.org <mailto:App_rpt-users@ohnosec.org> http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users <http://ohnosec.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/app_rpt-users>

1 0

basic testing of a new system?
by Kevin Oleniczak 04 Oct '12

04 Oct '12

I setup a ACID box with a URIx. I've cabled it to a HT for now to test with and can key the radio and send test audio per the FAQ. For now, i don't plan to tie in with the Allstar network. I would like to do some additional testing to see the capabilities with interfacing with the PSTN which i have another working Asterisk box going. While there is a lot written about app_rpt, i don't see more of the instructions to do various operations. Is there a reference for other basic tests i can do to exercise the system? thanks

1 0

rptbridge
by Jeffrey S. Carrier 04 Oct '12

04 Oct '12

I'm probably missing something but I can seem to find the answer anywhere so I thought I'd turn to the experts. Can rptbridge be used to bridge say 3 different nodes on 3 different servers which are all on the same LAN? I have them set up to do a permanent connection and didn't know if this might be a better way. Thanks, Jeff KØJSC

1 1